Slip
Jan 17, 01:37 PM
Ahh, free stuff at events, really caps off the day :rolleyes:
DanielCoffey
Apr 14, 03:01 PM
Can you still see all your RAM? Is there anything running in the background like Seti@Home and so on?
tjb1
May 2, 02:58 PM
I dont understand why you insist on spending $60+ on a converter board and bracket...everyone including myself have a lot of success with the one from smk312 on ebay and I believe its $20-$28. There are really no electronics on that board, it basically just converts from one plug to another.
Hellhammer
Apr 12, 10:05 AM
Won't work with OS X at least.
Compatible with Windows XP 32/64, Vista 32/64, Windows 7 32/64
http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-revodrive-x2-pci-express-ssd.html
Compatible with Windows XP 32/64, Vista 32/64, Windows 7 32/64
http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-revodrive-x2-pci-express-ssd.html
more...
bluap84
Feb 25, 02:11 AM
P�blished
Umlauts make everything better!
PS: love the logo:)
cheers man it was super simple. Just some cool font, then moved around in Illustrator.
cheers for the comments, im still thinking of names but this one has kinda stuck atm.
and LOL @ Be Sharps didnt know who they were till i googled...oh i LOL ... :D
Umlauts make everything better!
PS: love the logo:)
cheers man it was super simple. Just some cool font, then moved around in Illustrator.
cheers for the comments, im still thinking of names but this one has kinda stuck atm.
and LOL @ Be Sharps didnt know who they were till i googled...oh i LOL ... :D
MrFusion
Apr 24, 07:21 AM
I recently realized the existence of void pointers. These are quite useful if the primitive type for a data storage class is not known. Though, I have a question as to whether I am using them correctly.
My storage class will allocate memory and keep track of the byte size of the individual pieces. The user then set and extract bytes via void * pointers.
The storage class then copies bytes to and from the storage memory as needed. Basically my own crude implementation of NSMutableArray/NSMutableData.
The user gets back a void * pointer and then casts this into whatever is needed. Yes, probably too much responsibility is given to the user.
Anyway, I am concerned about memory leaks. To return a value, I memcpy() the bytes into a newly created memory malloc(). But there is no corresponding free().
The user has to free the memory. But calling free after casting and dereferencing causes a crash. Does memory have to be freed in this case? See last for loop.
Thanks for reading, replying and hopefully a lesson in pointers.
int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) {
more...
pictures of zac efron in 2011.
Zac Efron Actor Zac Efron,
more...
Zac Efron Halle Berry leaving
8 of 17. Zac
more...
Zac Efron Joins #39;Die In A
New (HQ) Zac Efron 2011
more...
zac efron 2011 pics. zac efron 2011 beach. zac; zac efron 2011 beach. zac. munkle. Feb 27, 02:00 PM
Justin Bieber And Zac Efron
more...
zac efron 2011 calendar
Will Zac Efron Play Ronald
more...
zac efron 2011 beach.
zac efron 2011
zac efron 2011 shirtless.
My storage class will allocate memory and keep track of the byte size of the individual pieces. The user then set and extract bytes via void * pointers.
The storage class then copies bytes to and from the storage memory as needed. Basically my own crude implementation of NSMutableArray/NSMutableData.
The user gets back a void * pointer and then casts this into whatever is needed. Yes, probably too much responsibility is given to the user.
Anyway, I am concerned about memory leaks. To return a value, I memcpy() the bytes into a newly created memory malloc(). But there is no corresponding free().
The user has to free the memory. But calling free after casting and dereferencing causes a crash. Does memory have to be freed in this case? See last for loop.
Thanks for reading, replying and hopefully a lesson in pointers.
int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) {
more...
mif
Apr 12, 01:15 AM
or vice versa
Ikyo
Mar 3, 08:59 AM
I am thinking about it, but not sure how early to get there to wait in line.
more...
tazo
Oct 13, 10:32 PM
Originally posted by King Cobra
I kind of feel that way, since I've been posting a lot...and also since I can remember back to the great spikey vs. joey j wars.
BTW: Not the dreaded nightsextar tazo! :eek:
nightsextar?
I kind of feel that way, since I've been posting a lot...and also since I can remember back to the great spikey vs. joey j wars.
BTW: Not the dreaded nightsextar tazo! :eek:
nightsextar?
AidenShaw
Jan 13, 02:35 PM
That might put Cisco in its place, being that the 'i'Mac was introduced on May 6, of 1996.
Actually, it was 1998 (http://www.apple-history.com/?page=gallery&model=imac&performa=off&sort=date&order=ASC)
Even then, one could argue that Apple forfeited the right to all "i-products" when it didn't sue Compaq for the iPaq....
Actually, it was 1998 (http://www.apple-history.com/?page=gallery&model=imac&performa=off&sort=date&order=ASC)
Even then, one could argue that Apple forfeited the right to all "i-products" when it didn't sue Compaq for the iPaq....
more...
ozontheroad
Oct 18, 12:49 AM
Fantastic work mate
ITASOR
Dec 10, 07:32 PM
I have a Super Disk drive. It's like ZIP disks, only they're 120MB. It's USB and something else which might be SCSI. I could include 5+ 120MB Superdisks. This drive will also read 1.44MB Floppy Disks. The drive itself is an IMATION Super Disk Drive and is clear in color.
more...
iccy82
Jun 20, 10:49 PM
wow, didn't realize we have dukies here @ MR -_-
dukie is everywhere :)
dukie is everywhere :)
Moof1904
Feb 23, 07:58 PM
I guess I'm even more lame in Terminal than I thought. The volume name is "New Volume" and I'm having trouble changing to the correct directory. Terminal keeps telling me No such file or directory.
more...
tombo
Nov 16, 05:33 AM
i second the jbl creatures, i have a set of the silver ones and the sound quality is really good.
I also have a set of JBL Creatures, but I wouldn't say the sound quality is really good. They are very good for the price, and I do love them to bits but they don't cope very well at high volume (like, Maximum).
They are fine for a bedroom, but I don't think they have enough 'in hand' to be loud in a large room. I am fussy, but I get some distortion when listening to them very loud. Great for gaming and mp3, but not for listening to classical music or hard-house up high.
They look superb, though :)
I also have a set of JBL Creatures, but I wouldn't say the sound quality is really good. They are very good for the price, and I do love them to bits but they don't cope very well at high volume (like, Maximum).
They are fine for a bedroom, but I don't think they have enough 'in hand' to be loud in a large room. I am fussy, but I get some distortion when listening to them very loud. Great for gaming and mp3, but not for listening to classical music or hard-house up high.
They look superb, though :)
JSRockit
Sep 8, 06:55 PM
I hope they are wrong. It is really sad. Apple just keeps falling behind more and more.
more...
iGary
Sep 23, 12:28 PM
I'll just fire myself and all of you with me. :D
LimeiBook86
Dec 21, 10:52 PM
Looks nice but I am confused about what it is trying to say. They sell products now? :confused:
benthewraith
Apr 6, 08:40 PM
What are some of your favorite brands in your life. Apple is a given, but what others? Are you into Voss drinking water? Do you only wear Prada.. Just curious. I'll update mine later
Lucky, Diesel and AE jeans.
Lucky and Express shirts.
Fossil watches
Fossil wallets
Coca Cola
Glaceau Smart Water
Old Spice body spray (after hours)
Ralph Lauren Polo Black/Blue (prefer Blue)
Canon cameras
Nike shoes
Lucky, Diesel and AE jeans.
Lucky and Express shirts.
Fossil watches
Fossil wallets
Coca Cola
Glaceau Smart Water
Old Spice body spray (after hours)
Ralph Lauren Polo Black/Blue (prefer Blue)
Canon cameras
Nike shoes
mrblack927
Mar 16, 09:07 AM
Wow, it's nice of Apple to provide a little explanation there!
Does this mean they might change the appearance more drastically later, instead of just re-enabling Graphite?
It could mean that, or it could mean they just haven't updated the graphite versions of the buttons/loading bars/etc yet. I would love to see them offer more color options, but I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up being just blue and graphite again. :o
Does this mean they might change the appearance more drastically later, instead of just re-enabling Graphite?
It could mean that, or it could mean they just haven't updated the graphite versions of the buttons/loading bars/etc yet. I would love to see them offer more color options, but I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up being just blue and graphite again. :o
pmz
Jun 17, 05:03 PM
As long as you sign up to be a safari developer (for free), then you are officially a developer to apple and can access the videos. So it is free to watch all of the videos, all you have to do is sign up with the safari development program.
Thank you, this worked for me
Thank you, this worked for me
dolphindolphin
Feb 24, 03:22 PM
Yup, same thing going on for me.
smiddlehurst
May 5, 05:17 AM
Hyperthreading is the latest name for an Intel technology that effectively allows a single physical core to run as two virtual cores. So in the current iMac range the i5 processors have 4 physical cores and can run 4 threads in parallel. The i7 processores have 4 physical cores but can run 8 threads in parallel thanks to hyperthreading.
So Hyperthreading only really offers an advantage with applications that are designed to run on multiple cores. Unfortunately things aren't entirely that simple as there's also the slightly faster clock speed of the i7 and Turbo Boost to consider.
Turbo Boost effectively lets a processor speed up when it's not using all of its cores by 'shutting off' the cores that aren't in use. Off the top of my head the i5 3.1Ghz can Turbo Boost to 3.4Ghz while the i7 3.4Ghz can run to 3.8Ghz. The real world difference is relatively small but can be worth a couple of frames a second in a game or a few seconds off a benchmark.
Hope that helps a bit, if there's anything there that's not clear just ask.
So Hyperthreading only really offers an advantage with applications that are designed to run on multiple cores. Unfortunately things aren't entirely that simple as there's also the slightly faster clock speed of the i7 and Turbo Boost to consider.
Turbo Boost effectively lets a processor speed up when it's not using all of its cores by 'shutting off' the cores that aren't in use. Off the top of my head the i5 3.1Ghz can Turbo Boost to 3.4Ghz while the i7 3.4Ghz can run to 3.8Ghz. The real world difference is relatively small but can be worth a couple of frames a second in a game or a few seconds off a benchmark.
Hope that helps a bit, if there's anything there that's not clear just ask.
ClassicII
May 19, 07:11 PM
375 shipped!!!
DAMN!
DAMN!
No comments:
Post a Comment